Two weeks ago I watched an
unsettling documentary on PBS TV about the future demographics of race in
America. The program was professionally put together. Many experts were
interviewed representing a wide range of minority interests. It was fascinating
to see how the face of America has changed in the last couple centuries, and to
see what it might look like in the future.
The most arresting datum for me (as a white man) was the change that
will happen in the next few years: whites will no longer make up the majority of
the American population.
This remarkable fact was meant to make a point. In fact it was meant to be the main point of the program. It was also meant to be alarming. And sadly, the conclusions to be drawn from this fact where made out to be somewhat sensational. They don’t need to be.
The PBS normally does a good
job of not moralizing. It wasn’t so successful this time. Its argument was that
race issues can be avoided (both now and in the future) if we focus on
resolving class differences instead of worrying about race. Poverty and crime
cut across all races and we shouldn’t stereotype. I agree.
But one of the implications
of the program was that since we have been plagued with race problems from the
beginning, we Americans will continue to be plagued by them if we don’t get our
act together. And if we don’t, the tables will be turned. Instead of white
supremacy, previous minorities will now have their say. Whites need beware.
The PBS should know better. And
the reason it should know better is because America has a culture – believe it
or not. It may not be a universal culture – certainly we come from many places.
And many of us try to live beyond the constraints of this culture. But this
culture exists nonetheless (both now and in the past) and it transcends both
race and class. This culture is called Christianity.
The very fact of this
Christian culture in America is studiously ignored in the public square. PBS is
not alone in pretending that it makes little, if any, difference in our modern
world. And besides, what many may call Christian culture really divides along
racial lines anyway. It all boils down to race in the end – or so the argument
goes.
But I disagree. Certainly we
have local congregations that follow racial patterns. You don’t find too many
whites in a black Baptist church in rural Alabama. Nor do you find too many
black Mormons in central Idaho. But here
is my point: they do occur. And this racial mixing occurs a lot more commonly
in metropolitan communities.
Even where this mixing is
minimal, Christians are now more willing than ever to reach across racial lines
in a shared community of faith. This last weekend I attended an inter-faith
Thanksgiving service here in Fresno where I watched nearly a dozen faith communities
accept and rejoice in our religious diversity. My son, who lives 3,000 miles
away, occasionally attends a similar inter-faith community in Virginia. This is
happening all across the country. Americans of faith are recognizing that the
differences between their respective faiths are minor compared to the larger
issues of rampant moral decay.
We see more and more that
this widespread social concern is making the former issues of racial mixing less
and less important. In many congregations race is no issue at all. The reason
is simple enough: Christ teaches us to love all of our brothers and sisters. And
in America right now, this Christian mixing is happening all the time, and in
increasing amounts. The possibility of future inter-racial harmony in America
is bright so long as we continue to follow Christ.
This may all sound
historically naïve. After all, America was much more religious in former times
when race relations were worse than they are now. How, then, can I claim for a
mollifying Christian influence today? Let
me explain.
The first, and most obvious,
argument is the compromises revolving around religion during the Constitutional
Convention. Madison’s religious arguments, culminating in the First Amendment,
allowed for a religiously diverse ensemble of states to join hands in a common
cause. In fact this religious pluralism has probably done more than anything
else to make America what it is today: the most religiously diverse and dynamic
country in the world. And it is important that nearly all of the Founders were
Christians. Even the few that may have had deistic leanings were morally
grounded in the teachings of Christ.
And this Christian majority
continued to inform American culture into the 19th Century. Alexis
de Tocqueville, writing in the mid-19th Century, argued that “all
the sects in the United States are within the great Christian unity, and the
morality of Christianity is everywhere the same… So, therefore, at the same time
that the law permits the American people to do everything, religion prevents
them from conceiving everything and forbids them to dare everything.”
But what about the Civil War,
where both the North and the South claimed to be Christians? Doesn’t this argue
against my point of a convivial Christian culture? Well yes and no. Yes the
Civil War saw Christians fighting against Christians. But a very relevant point
is to be made that religion was not the main driver in the war. Economics,
states’ rights and the protection of a culture were the main points. Yes each
side in the conflict justified their position by quoting from the Bible. But
the Civil War itself was not a war about the Bible.
It just happens that the
issue of slavery can be ambiguous in the Bible. Issues of civil rights are no
longer so ambiguous. A slave owner could argue against treating property (his
slave) with the respect due to his neighbor – as Jesus’ teaching of the Good
Samaritan requires. But this is no longer the case. No nation in our time
accepts this corrupted version of human dignity. Even in our most segregated
white churches today, racial equality is taught as a Christian mandate in
Sunday school – even if not everybody totally agrees.
America changed a great deal
after the Civil War. It changed again significantly after World War II.
Christianity became much more diverse and more political. It also went through
various cycles of popularity. Even during the 60’s and 70’s, when the media
portrayed any Christian affiliation in a negative light, America remained
predominantly Christian. And it remains so today.
Some older members of our
congregations may have grown up in segregated communities and still feel uneasy
around anybody that looks different than they do. But their grandchildren are
playing with a world community that completely transcends the provincialism of
yesteryear. In America’s Christian
churches today, race is not a limiting factor – at least doctrinally. And it is
becoming less and less of a factor culturally.
I remember several years ago
attending church in Maui, Hawaii. I was amazed (and very pleased) at the racial
diversity in the congregation. The leaders on the stand were of Anglo and
Hawaiian heritage. Others in the
congregation were from Latin America, some were from Africa, some were from the
Philippines, others were from South Korea and other Asian countries, still
others were from different parts of Polynesia. I (as a white man) was not in
the majority. In fact there was no majority – except for the fact that we were
all Christians – Mormons to be precise.
Did this commonality detract
from individual family histories? I mean did individuals have to give up their
heritage in order to be part of the group? Not at all. In fact the Hawaiian
gentleman who conducted the meeting wore the expected white shirt and tie along
with a nice Hawaiian lava-lava. Christianity does not destroy local cultures –
it enables them.
Maybe this sounds a little
too strong. But think about what it implies. Most cultures identify themselves
by their virtues. Of course they are not blind to skin color or other obvious
differences. But if you ask someone to describe their own culture, they almost
always tell you about a locality, a faith, a heritage. It’s when we think of other (i.e. not our own) cultures that
we invoke skin color, bad habits, and incomprehensible behaviors.
And Christianity is an
inclusive culture. It also happens to be the major religion among the growing
population of America. The growing Hispanic population is predominantly
Catholic (but with Protestant and Mormon elements as well). The Black community
is primarily Protestant (often Baptist). The White population that continues to
grow is predominantly Christian (with Catholics and Mormons having the most
children).
Of this religious core (made
up primarily of Christians) Russell Reno states: “Decades of survey results
report that around 40 percent of Americans say they attend church more or less
weekly. Some sociologists speculate that this cohort, what I call the
“committed core,” has been pretty constant for more than one hundred years.
Sociologists know that people over-report their religious observance. Fieldwork
suggests that 25 percent of the population goes to church weekly. However one
parses the data, the fact remains: For a very long time, the committed core has
been stable and substantial. It looks to remain so.”
America may be headed for a
changing demographic future but the Christian majority is not going anywhere. I
do not doubt that we will have to deal with some ongoing racial conflict. But I
do doubt that the declining white population will be cause for greater
violence. Nor do I think that we have to focus on class parity, like PBS
suggests. America’s changing appearance is not the concern. The bigger issue is
to deny our Christian heritage. Sadly, we can’t expect the popular media to
give this reality much consideration. But this is to be expected. Popular media
have always been jealous of religion’s cultural significance. We just need to
be wiser than they are, lest these sensational documentaries become
self-fulfilling prophesies.
References
Tocqueville’s quote is from Democracy in America (The University of
Chicago Press, 2000) Volume One, Part Two, Chapter Nine. For a look at American
religion after the war see Patrick Allitt, Religion
in America since 1945. Reno’s quote comes from the most recent issue
(December 2012) of First Things, pp. 4-5.
No comments:
Post a Comment